Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 1229-6457(Print)
ISSN : 2466-040X(Online)
The Korean Journal of Vision Science Vol.20 No.3 pp.241-248
DOI : https://doi.org/10.17337/JMBI.2018.20.3.241

Degradation in Legibility of English and Chinese Letters by Wearing of Progressive Addition Lenses

Hae-In Kwon, Shin-Hwa Kim, Dal-Young Kim*
Department of Optometry, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul
July 31, 2018 September 3, 2018 September 18, 2018

Abstract

Purpose :

Progressive additional lenses are being prescribed for short-sighted children to suppress the development of myopia. However, they are supposed to cause degradation in legibility of English and Chinese letters due to the narrow visual field of their intermediate zones. The purpose of this study is to compare the legibility of English and Chinese letters when readers wear progressive additional lenses to that when they wear single focus lenses.


Methods :

A total of 40 subjects participated in this study. They were asked to find a designated letter as they read English or Chinese texts while wearing progressive additional lenses or single focus lenses. The length of time it took to read the given texts was measured, and the measurements were compared between wearing progressive additional lenses and wearing single focus lenses. The reading time was regarded as a criterion of legibility by the speed of reading method.


Results :

The subjects took longer to read the texts when wearing progressive additional lenses than when wearing single focus lenses for both English and Chinese letters. Statistical significance was also observed in the case of the English letter ‘m’ and the Chinese letter ‘一’.


Conclusions :

It was plausible that wearing progressive additional lenses resulted in longer reading time and degradation in legibility, due to the narrow visual field of the intermediate zone of progressive additional lenses. Such degradation of legibility could also lower readability and learning ability. Considering this, progressive additional lenses should be more carefully prescribed for short-sighted and school-aged children.



누진렌즈 착용자의 영문과 중문 글자 가독성 저하

    Ⅰ. Introduction

    Recently, as the importance of smart education with information technology increases, readability of display also becomes more and more important in education.1) As results of several studies that suggested the effect of wearing progressive addition lenses (PALs) suppressed development of myopia,2-4) PALs have frequently been prescribed in recent years for children and teenagers with myopia.

    However, PALs have a narrower visual field than single focus lenses (SFLs),5) which may cause degradation in legibility and then adecline in the students’ learning ability as well. In a previous study, one of the authors already pointed out the degradation in legibility of Korean letters (Han-Gul) when wearing PALs.6)

    Letters have their own characteristics; therefore, it cannot be presumed that the results for Korean letters would be the same for another type of letters. For example, Korean letters are almost cubic and are put in type with almost the same width.7) Meanwhile, the widths of English letters are not the same as one another when being typeset.8) So it has to be tested whether wearing of PALs also affects legibility of other types of letters, similarly to Korean letters.

    English and Chinese were chosen for the test letters because they are two of the most frequently used letters in the world. In this study, the legibility of English and Chinese letters were measured when readers wore PALs and also compared to the legibility when readers wore SFLs.

    Ⅱ. METHODS

    This study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Public Institutional Review Board designated by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare. Every subject agreed to participate in this research by signing documents of written consent, after being informed about the nature and possible consequences of study participation.

    Subjects

    In total, 47 volunteers applied to participate in this study. Seven of them were excluded due to physical, mental, or ocular illness, or their experience of ophthalmic surgery (for example, LASIK). Seventeen of them were male and others were female. Characteristics of the subjects were shown in Table 1. Visual acuities of the subjects were corrected to 20/20 before reading time measurements, so as not to affect the measurements. All the subjects were Korean, but they had been taught English and Chinese letters for years from their elementary or middle school days.

    Before measuring the reading time, simple explanations about PALs were given to the subjects because they did not have experience to wear PALs. The data were collected from neither subject in their 20s or old people wearing PALs. It is because this is not a study on people who are wearing PALs due to presbyopia but a study on children wearing PALs for suppression of the development of myopia.

    Lenses specification

    The PALs used in this study were the XL Trial Lenses from SOLA International Inc., with +1.00 D additions and the soft design. Their fitting heights are 14 mm, and widths of their intermediate zone are 6.5 mm at minimum.9,10) Using the intermediate zone of PALs, the subjects were asked to read letters on visual charts displayed on the monitors described below.

    The SFLs used in this study were also the Trial Lenses from SOLA International Inc. They had +0.50 D additions, which were the same as the average addition of the narrow intermediate zone of the PALs. The additions were for investigation of the effects of the narrow visual fields of PALs on legibility, subtracting the defocus effect of PALs.

    Text Charts

    The text charts utilized in this study were designed according to a previous study.6) In Figs. 1 and 2 show examples of the English and Chinese text charts applied in this study. Their dimensions were 26.4 cm in width by 5.5 cm in height. They were made using Microsoft Power-Point (2010), and English or Chinese letters were arranged in six lines with 1.5 lines spacing. The letters were in Times New Roman font for English and PMingLiU font for Chinese, with 12-point letter size. The letters on the text charts were randomly arranged using the Random Sampling Function of Microsoft Excel.

    The English letters ‘m’ and ‘s’ were selected for the English charts, and the Chinese letters ‘一’ and ‘觀’ were selected for the Chinese charts. Even among the English letters or the Chinese letters, the legibility of each letter differs from one another.11) One letter of high legibility and the other letter of low legibility were selected for both languages. The letters ‘m’ and ‘一’ were the letters of high legibility, while the letters ‘s’ and ‘觀’ were the letters of low legibility. Of the 4 selected letters, one letter was designated to be found in each text chart. The text charts were designed so that the designated letter appeared 20 times. Five text charts were made for each of the 4 selected letters (that is, 20 text charts in total), and they were randomly presented to the subjects to avoid the learning effect and systemic error.

    The letter charts used is not a good representation of reading material in the real world as they are just random distribution of letters, not a real sentence. However, the subjects (Korean college students) are not educated to read Chinese sentence or text but Chinese letters only. So the charts that consist of randomly distributed letters had to be used for Chinese, and also for English, to keep consistency through this study.

    Display

    The visual charts were displayed on a MOTVMT-17D monitor made from NTNSC&C Inc., which was a liquid crystal display (LCD) including 17 inches in width, with a resolution of 1024ⅹ768, and 32-bit true colours.

    Reading Time Measurement

    There are many kinds of legibility measurement methods, such as the visibility method,12,13) the defocus method,13,14) the short-exposure method,15) the blink rate method,16) the distance method,17) the speed of reading method,7,13,17) and the measurement of eye movements.18-20) Among them, the speed of reading method was chosen to measure legibility in this study. The speed of reading method evaluates the legibility of the text based on how much time it takes the subjects to read the text. The longer the reading time is, the worse the legibility is.

    Study Design

    The reading times were measured when the subjects wore the PALs and the SFLs. The sequence of wearing the PALs and SFLs was randomized. The reading times with PALs were compared to that with SFLs.

    The heads of the subjects were set up at 64 cm from the monitor, where the 12-point sized letters corresponds to 20/47 visual charts, following to the previous studies.6,21 The heads were fixed to prevent the effect of head movement during reading. When the subjects wore PALs, the positions and angles of the PALs and the monitor were appropriately adjusted so that the subjects had to read the text charts through the narrow intermediate region of the PALs. On the other hand, there was no limitation of visual field when the subjects wore the SFLs.

    The subjects were asked to read the given texts on the monitor, indicating where they were reading using a cursor. They were also asked to mark the designated letter of the chart by a mouse-click whenever they found it. This marking instruction was given to make the subjects sincerely read the texts. Fig. 3 shows an example of the text chart on which the designated letter ‘m’ was marked by mouse-click of a subject. The subjects were also asked not to read backward. By a second monitor displaying the same picture as a first monitor for the subject, it was verified whether the subjects sincerely followed the instructions or not during reading. Before reading, the subjects practiced their task to acclimatize a few times to the measurement set-up.

    The reading times were measured and recorded when the subjects took to read the given text and to find the designated letter on the chart. The 4 selected letters were designated in a random sequence, so every subject had to read 4 text charts in series with a different designated letter. Break times of 1 minute were given between reading each text chart.

    Statistical Analysis

    For each of the 4 selected letters, the measured reading times were averaged over the 40 subjects. The average data were analysed by the paired t-test method by IBM SPSS statistics 18. The lens types (PALs or SFLs) were assigned as independent variables, and the average reading time were assigned as dependent variables.

    Ⅲ. RESULTS

    Table 2 shows the average reading times and the results of the paired t-tests for English letters. When subjects wore PALs, the average reading times were approximately 93 second for ‘ m’ and approximately 110 second for ‘s’. These were longer than the average reading times when wearing SFLs, which were approximately 88 second for ‘m’ and approximately 108 second for ‘s ’. The difference between the average reading times for ‘m’ was statistically significant, but the difference was not shown significant for ‘s’.

    Table 3 presents similar results for Chinese letters. The average reading times when wearing PALs were approximately 61 second for ‘一’ and approximately 91 second for ‘觀’. These results were also longer than the reading times when wearing SFLs, which were approximately 54 second for ‘一’ and approximately 87 second for ‘ 觀’. The difference between the average reading times for ‘一’ was statistically significant, but the difference was not shown significant for ‘觀’.

    For all the 4 designated letters, the average reading times when wearing PALs were consistently longer than those when wearing SFLs. The results for the letters ‘m’ and ‘一’ were statistically significant. Therefore, we could estimate from these results that it took longer to read the texts while wearing PALs than while wearing SFLs.

    Based on the results in Tables 2 and 3, it revealed the consistent tendency for the reading times to increase when wearing the PALs meaning that wearing PALs degrades the legibility of English and Chinese letters.

    Table 4 depicts similar results of the reading time measurements for the Korean letters, which are quoted from a previous report written by Ku and one of the authors of this work.6)The results in Table 4 were measured by the same method to this study except for differences in the type of letters and the subjects groups. The results in Table 4 show similar statistically significant increase in the average reading times, when wearing PALs. It also supports our hypothesis that wearing PALs degrades the legibility of letters.

    Ⅳ. DISCUSSION

    The legibility of letters might be lowered when readers wear PALs due to the narrow visual field of the intermediate zone of PALs.6) The width of the intermediate zones used in these measurements was 6.5 mm in length and equivalent to 14° in angle,10,21) while the width of the text charts was 26.4 cm in length and equivalent to 23.1° at distance of 64cm. The narrow visual field of the intermediate zone might hinder reading of wide text charts contributing to lower the legibility of the letters.

    On the other hand, considering of the binocular vision, the horizontal visual field is supposed to be about 28° through the intermediate zone of the progressive lenses. In the actual experiment, it was possible to read the 26.4 cm-wide web document without head movement. The degradation of legibility may not solely be due to the narrow visual fields of progressive lenses in monocular vision. The degradation of legibility could also be due to imperfect binocular fusion, that is, two monocular images are not fully fused under binocular vision, caused by the narrow visual fields of progressive lenses.21,22)

    It was known that wearing PALs weakly suppresses the development of myopia;2,4) therefore, PALs have been prescribed for school-aged children with short-sightedness for years. The suppression of myopia development could be a positive aspect of wearing PALs.

    Along with the development of information technology, learning has been actively carried out not only by text books (through near part of progressive lenses) but also by PC displays (through intermediate zone of progressive lenses) more and more. It was revealed from this study that wearing PALs could degrade the legibility of letters due to the narrow visual field of PALS. This degradation of legibility would be a negative aspect of wearing PALs, especially for school-aged children.

    It is well known that legibility affects readability, and low readability makes it harder to learn information from text.13,17,23) Therefore, the degradation of legibility can result in lowered learning ability.24) Therefore, the progressive lens prescribed for the suppression of near-sightedness may lead to a deterioration in students' readability and learning ability in the education using PC displays. This negative aspect should carefully be considered when an optometrist or ophthalmologist prescribes PALs for school-aged children.

    This study had several limitations. At first, the fixation of head movement was not a realistic situation for school-aged children. At second, the subjects in their early 20s were not people of the children’s age, but rather were several years older than them. Finally, these reading time measurements were performed using only one type of PALs, the SOLA XL trial lenses. The next study is in progress and includes more realistic situations regarding the limitations such as the head movement and the subject group issue, using various types of PALs. This study would investigate not only legibility but also readability and learning ability.

    ACKNOWLEDEMENTS

    This study was supported by the Research Program funded by the Seoul Tech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology).

    Figure

    KJVS-20-241_F1.gif

    An example of English visual charts used in this study.

    KJVS-20-241_F2.gif

    An example of Chinese visual charts used in this study

    KJVS-20-241_F3.gif

    An example of the English visual chart on which the designated letter ‘m’ was marked by mouse-click of the subject. (The subject missed the letter ‘m’ twice on the chart.)

    Table

    The mean and standard deviation of characteristics of the subjects.

    The average reading times and results of the paired t-tests for English letters

    The average reading times and results of the paired t-tests for Chinese letters

    The average reading times and results of the paired t-tests for Korean letters (quoted from Ref. 6).

    Reference

    1. Rosenfield M, Howarth PA et al.: Vision and IT displays: a whole new visual world. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2012; 32: 363-366.
    2. Leung JTM, Brown B. Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese school children is slowed by wearing progressive lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76: 346-354.
    3. Gwiazda J, Hyman L et al.: A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1492-1500.
    4. Sankaridurg P, Donovan L et al.: Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 631-641.
    5. Guilino GH.: Design philosophy for progressive addition lenses. Appl Opt 2001; 31: 111-115.
    6. Ku HY, Kim DY.: Comparative study of Korean letters legibility of progressive lens wearers and single focus lens wearers under the VDT circumstance. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc 2012; 17: 195-202.
    7. Choi DC, Park YT.: A study on stroke widthto- height ratio and reading distance of the Korean character. J Human Eng Soc Korea 1987; 6(2): 9-18.
    8. Gibson EJ.: Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
    9. Bridgman G, Burton J.: Progressive addition lenses for dentists with presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 1992; 75(3): 109-113.
    10. Bell GR.: Verifying and evaluating progressive addition lenses in clinical practice. Optometry 2001; 72(4): 239-246.
    11. Sanford EC.: The relative legibility of the small letters. Am J Psychol 1888; 1(3): 402-435.
    12. Luckiesh M, Moss FK.: Reading as a Visual Task. New York: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1942.
    13. Subbaram VM.: Effect of display and text parameters on reading performance. Ph. D. Thesis. The Ohio State University. 2004.
    14. Weiss AP.: The focal variator. J Exp Psychol 1917; 2(2): 106-113.
    15. Potter MC, Kroll JF et al.: Comprehension and memory in rapid sequential reading. In: Nickerson RS ed. Attention and Performance Ⅷ. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980. pp 395-418.
    16. Patel S, Henderson R et al.: Effect of visual display unit used on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68(11): 888-892.
    17. Reynolds L.: Progress in documentation: legibility studies: Their relevance to present-day documentation methods. Journal of Documentation 1979; 35(4): 307-340.
    18. Tai YC, Sheedy JE et al.: Effect of letter spacing on legibility, eye movements, and reading speed. J Vis 2006; 6(6): 994.
    19. Slattery TJ, Rayner K.: The influence of text legibility on eye movements during reading. Appl Cognitiv Psychol 2010; 24(8): 1129-1148.
    20. Kim JY, Lee MH, Min SN et al.: Quantitative comparison of the e-book and paper-book by using eye-tracker. J Ergonom Soc Korea 2012; 31(5): 609-616.
    21. Selenow A, Bauer E et al.: Assessing visual performance with progressive addition lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79(8): 502-505.
    22. Meister D.: Fundamentals of progressive lens design. Vision Care Product News 2006; 6(9): 1-6.
    23. Tinker MA.: Legibility of Print. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1964.
    24. Goldstand S, Koslowe KC et al.: Vision, visual-information processing, and academic performance among seventh-grade school children: A more significant relationship than we thought? Am J Occupational Therapy 2005; 59: 377–389.